I laugh when I hear all this bullshit about the latino vote and that they support CIR Don't fall for that latino vote hyped up propaganda Last edited by cooltalker; at PM..
Originally Posted by cooltalker. They claim it is unfair to that they had to follow the law while we are getting a free ticket to citizenship. I can't source the study but I remember reading about it a year or two ago. Originally Posted by lilbawler Almost every legal immigrant i have met so far don't mind us getting some form of legal status. Almost every legal immigrant I have met is against it.
Either way, let's forget point number 4, but you cannot ignore the other 3 points I made. You cannot dismiss my whole argument based on one point you believe to be false.
Anyways, you have your speculations and I have mine. They are going to support DA only if tea party support DA too, which is impossible. E Find all posts by L. DA is dead, but if your willing to waste another 10 years of your life then good for you. I was optimistic that it'll pass this month but nope. We had the momentum, we had everything except money. Not mentioning we are also illegals and cannot vote.
DA User. He has voted against increasing the number of employment-based immigrant visas. He believes that the number of refugees admitted to the U. Representative Steve King. The person likely to become the Chairman of the House Immigration Subcommittee is an immigration restrictionist with enforcement-only voting record.
Smith on the need for strong border and workplace enforcement, mandatory e-verify and ending birthright citizenship. He believes that it would be easy to increase border security by such means as electrifying the border fence. As he recently stated in the House chamber: "We do that with livestock all the time. What does Congressman King have to say about legal immigration? I will work to develop an immigration policy that aids in the assimilation of newcomers by ensuring that the United States does not admit more immigrants than it can reasonably accommodate.
Assimilation is valuable to immigrants who benefit from our shared American culture of personal responsibility, freedom, and patriotism. The values shared by our civilization, founded on a heritage of western civilization, religious freedom and free enterprise capitalism, serve immigrants and native-born alike.
I am concerned that the recent rise in immigration levels in this country will make it difficult for newcomers to assimilate and find jobs. We must ensure cultural continuity for our great nation. So, should immigrants and their advocates give up on the idea that any positive immigration legislation will be signed into law during the next two years?
Members of Congress, whatever their ideology, must represent the interests of their constituents. You may be surprised to learn that Rep. Smith once voted to increase the H-1B cap. Of course, one of the largest computer companies in the world has a plant located in his district.
When Rep. Advances in the Family-Based preference categories in November were either minimal or non-existent with the exception of the 2B category for Filipinos which advanced 10 weeks. Additional advances are anticipated in the near future. However, it is quite another story in the EB-3 category where advances are measured in weeks rather than months.
A Petition for a Rehearing En Banc was denied. The Fifth Circuit , on September 8, also ruled that the clause is unambiguous, that the plain language shows that it applies to all derivative beneficiaries, and refused to defer to Matter of Wang.
Of course, this issue may ultimately have to be decided by the Supreme Court. However, in the interim, there is another method by which this lack of uniformity can be resolved. In the 9th Circuit, we have requested that the Court rehear this matter En Banc, that is, by more than just a three-judge panel.
En Banc review may be granted when: 1. When a decision departs from establish laws in the particular Circuit. We believe that all three of the above factors are present in the 9th Circuit, and we have detailed the reasons why this is so in our Petition for a Rehearing En Banc. We promise to keep you informed on this important issue.
When the US citizen patriarch of the Garcia not their real name family passed away on one tragic day in , the rest of the family was left not only without their father and grandfather, but also without their immigration sponsor. The Garcias knew that they would have to find some other way to get their green cards. Under the laws at that time, the family members sponsored by a deceased US citizen could only become permanent residents if they could show humanitarian reasons why the petition on their behalf should be reinstated.
Their case was in limbo due to the backlog in visa numbers. In this case, the backlog worked to their advantage, since by the time that visa numbers became available, a new law had passed that could help their case. The Garcia family first came to us in in the hopes of reviving their chances of obtaining permanent residence in the U.
They knew that the death of their sponsor complicated their case, and they came to see if there was anything we could do to get it back on track. We determined that their dead case had unexpectedly come back to life in , when Congress passed and President Obama signed a law that included provisions to protect the widows and survivors of family and employment-based immigration cases.
Under the new law, as long as family members were residing in the US at the time of death of the sponsor, they could still become permanent residents. We were not sure if the new law would apply retroactively to the Garcias as it was passed after the death of their sponsor. The law was so new that there was no guidance available. While humanitarian reinstatement was still an option for them—they did not have family or jobs to return to in their native country, the Philippines—we were glad to find there was a another route available to them.
We decided to exhaust all possibilities. Thankfully, the case was approved under the new law, so there was no need for humanitarian reinstatement. This spooky story is not complete without a little bit of hocus pocus.
In her case, we were able to subtract over days from her age since the visa petition was pending for this long. This was enough to magically convert her into a child in the eyes of the law. For now, she must wait. Despite the death of their sponsor, all members of the Garcia family continue to live together in the U. Most likely they started working in the United States using L-1A visas. You may know that a U.
0コメント